Editorial standards

How AEO Table keeps public AEO / GEO content trustworthy

These standards guide public blog, resource, methodology, sample report, comparison, and product pages published by AEO Table Editorial Team.

Sample data is labeled

Public examples, report tables, screenshots, and sample metrics are marked as sample or demo data when they do not describe a real customer result.

No unapproved customer proof

AEO Table does not publish customer names, logos, identifiable screenshots, or customer claims unless the customer has approved that use.

Methodology before certainty

AEO / GEO content separates measured evidence from claims about future AI answer behavior. No page promises a guaranteed ranking, citation, or AI Overview placement.

External claims need sources

Public statements about Google Search, AI Overviews, crawlers, structured data, security.txt, or third-party products should be tied to official or clearly attributable sources.

Product terms stay consistent

Public copy uses Task, Run, report, citations, competitors, visibility score, and credits consistently with the product object model.

Review rules

What public pages should not imply

AEO Table should be useful to AI search systems and buyers without inventing certainty, customer proof, or future placement promises.

Resource and methodology pages should make sample/demo data visible before a reader treats the content as evidence.

Blog and resource pages should distinguish AEO Table product behavior from external search or AI system behavior.

Claims about Google, AI Overviews, crawlers, structured data, or third-party tools should be source-backed or softened.

Customer proof should stay anonymous unless explicit permission exists.

Need the official company or contact details?

AEO Table publishes operator, contact, and security disclosure paths separately so content standards stay distinct from support.